by Edie Melson @EdieMelson
I field a lot of questions about the value of having a critique group and/or partner. There are as many answers as there are writers. But there are very few who are able to produce publishable writing in a vacuum.
For me personally, I wouldn’t be where I am today as a writer if it weren't for the groups who have nurtured me along the way.
Although we tend to think of writing as a primarily solitary pursuit, writing for publication is an endeavor built on forging relationships. And those relationships can ultimately determine our success or failure in the writing industry.
Here’s a list of those relationships.
- Between you and other writers
- Between you and the reader
- Between the reader and the subject or characters
- Between you and the editor
- Between you and your agent
I listed the relationship between writers first, because surprisingly, those are often the most vital in our writing life. The actual act of putting words on paper is a solitary act and because of that it’s easy to lose perspective.
Writing in a vacuum can give us a false sense of whether or not we’re effective in our endeavor. We either wind up thinking we’re a genius or sink into the depths of despair because we can’t string two coherent sentences together. Rarely is either perspective accurate.
We need others in our profession to give us feedback, keep us grounded and provide encouragement. You may be tempted, like I was at first, to insert friends and family into this role. Unless they’re also writers this dynamic just doesn’t work. They’ll unwittingly encourage you when you need a swift kick in the pants and administer the kick in the pants when you need encouragement.
That’s where a writers group, critique group or critique partner will help. But you have to be careful—some critique and writers groups can be toxic. I’ve visited some where the purpose appears to be to build up the one delivering the critique by tearing down the hapless author. You want to avoid these groups at all cost.
Here’s a list of what to look for in a group or a partner
- An encouraging atmosphere—not all sweetness and light—nobody improves on false compliments. But I’ve almost never found a manuscript that didn’t have some redeeming quality.
- A mutually beneficial relationship. You should both bring something valuable if it’s a partnership—you may excel at writing dialogue and your partner is a whiz at description.
- A hunger to improve. If it’s a group there should be a movement toward growth in the majority of members. Even if you’re all beginners, if you’re all reading writing books and attending classes you’ll be able to grow and learn together.
- A timekeeper. If someone’s not willing to keep track of the time not everyone will get a chance to be critiqued. It’s a dirty job, but someone’s got to do it!
- So now here’s your chance—what experiences have you had with writing groups and partnerships? Be sure to share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Don’t forget to join the conversation!
Blessings,
Edie
Melson is a woman of faith with ink-stained fingers observing life through the lens of her camera. No matter whether she’s talking to writers, entrepreneurs, or readers, her first advice is always “Find your voice, live your story.” As an author, blogger, and speaker she’s encouraged and challenged audiences across the country and around the world. Her numerous books reflect her passion to help others develop the strength of their God-given gifts and apply them to their lives. Connect with her on her website, through Facebook, Twitter and on Instagram.
FOr me, I prefer my critiwue group online. With an in-person one, I can't get through a manuscript quickly. My crit partners and I have been together for 18+ years. Most of us (there are 4) submite 1 to 2 chapters a week. But for new writers, the in-person group is excellent, since you see reactions as well as hear them..
ReplyDeleteI love Word Weavers. I've been with them for many years. 1500 words once a month is a great way for new writers to learn the craft. And the online group uses a timer and that makes sure everyone gets critiqued- we have up to seven people per group. I loved their in-person group too. I wouldn't have gotten to the place of publication without them.
ReplyDelete