by Vonda Skelton @VondaSkelton
Vonda Skelton is a speaker and the author of four books: Seeing Through the Lies: Unmasking the Myths Women Believe and the 3-book Bitsy Burroughs mysteries for children 8-12 yo. She’s the founder and co-director of Christian Communicators Conference, offering speakers’ training and community for Christian women called to ministry. Vonda is a frequent instructor at writer’s conferences and keynotes at business, women’s, and associational events. You can find out more about Vonda, as well as writing opportunities and instruction at her writer’s blog, The Christian Writer’s Den at VondaSkelton.com.
Readers
are smart. They’re smart because they read. And if there’s one thing smart
readers hate, it’s when writers treat them like they’re dumb.
One
way writers dumb down their readers is by info-dumping.
Check out these examples:
“When are things going to get back to the way they were
before? Can you believe it’s been ten years since daddy left us?”
Marsha turned
from her sister and wiped a tear. “We had to move into public housing and go on
food stamps. Then our brother died and Daddy never even knew. And then you had to ago
into rehab. It’s all his fault.”
Let’s
be honest here, would we ever have a conversation like that with our siblings?
I doubt it. After all, it’s simply a retelling of facts we would both already
know. It’s dumping info on to the page for the perceived benefit of the reader.
But our readers won’t appreciate the so-called benefit. They can see through
our ruse. They know that we’re taking the easy way out.
A
good writer will bring those backstory details into the plot layer by layer,
revealing facts and motivations through dialogue and POV in a more subtle,
natural delivery. One detail may come out on page 5 when Marsha stands in line
behind someone with food stamps. Another might be revealed on page 23 when
Marsha picks up her sister at rehab and they realize it’s been exactly 10 years
since their father left. Using this technique, your reader will be challenged
and satisfied by putting together the pieces of the puzzle.
Another
way to distance our readers is through unnecessary explanation. Ever read
passages similar to these?
- “I don’t care what you think!” Melanie yelled again. She wanted to be sure Jason had heard her.
- Carly placed the rock on the gravestone and cried because she missed her mother so much.
In
these two instances, the writer assumes the reader isn’t smart enough to figure
out the characters’ motivations, so he or she writes out an additional
explanation. But smart readers don’t appreciate the extra work the writer has
done. Instead of being a help, it’s an insult to their reading intelligence.
Well-written passages with well-developed characters don’t need explanation.
Which
brings me to the reason you’re getting this lesson today. This past Sunday was
my 61st birthday, complete with birthday wishes and jokes about
getting older. After church a funny thing happened as Gary and I prepared for
lunch…and I just had to share it with my Facebook friends.
Here’s
the story, copied and pasted from my Facebook page:
Okay, I’ll give all of you a laugh at my expense. This
afternoon Gary asked me what the two slices of bacon were doing in the
microwave. I told him it wasn’t me, that I hadn’t eaten any bacon since I made
that BLT on Friday. To which he asked, “Did you put bacon on it?”
I started to say, “Of course I did. What do you think I
am–Stupid?” But before I could say it, I suddenly remembered that I thought the
BLT didn’t have any flavor. Now I know why.
There was no B in the BLT.
As my friend, Karen O’Connor says in her book, “Getting old ain’t for wimps…”
Although
there are several things I would have written differently if I were writing it
for real publication, here are some things I did take the time to address.
When
I initially wrote it, I explained that
I had forgotten to put the bacon on my sandwich two days before. And I really
wanted to create more set-up by telling that Gary and I had discussed
flavorless winter tomatoes days before, setting me up to think it was the
tomatoes that caused the flavorless sandwich.
But
then it hit me: Readers don’t really care that we had discussed tomatoes
earlier, or that as a multitasking professional, I had moved on to other things
and forgotten about the bacon in the microwave.
As a
matter of fact, if I had it to do over again, I’d probably leave off the
reference to Karen O’Connor’s book, simply because adding anything after the
punchline takes away from the delivery.
But
one thing I think did go well was: There
was no B in the BLT.
Short,
to the point, and without explanation. I trusted my readers to get it.
And
they did.
Treat
your readers with respect and they’ll love you for it.
Can you recall a time the author info-dumped on you? Have
you experienced your own info-dumping? Don’t forget to join the conversation!
TWEETABLES
Thank you Vonda. This was an informative article. Praying for you as you get ready for CCC. I know many ladies will be blessed.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you found it helpful, Cherrilynn! And thank you for your prayers. It is definitely crunch time. We sure will miss you, but look forward to being with you next year!
DeleteI'm glad to know I'm not the only one who goes back and deletes the TMI from their facebook post. Cute story. How could you forget the BACON!
ReplyDeleteIsn't that the truth? To forget the bacon in the first place was crazy, but then to NOT realize it wasn't there when I ate the sandwich was crazy!!!
DeleteI have dealt with RUE (resist the urge to explain) before. And still do from time to time. (See, I had to explain that acrostic!) When I read fiction, I often look for how the author tells the backstory, and appreciate it when they're subtle about it. We can learn from that for writing non-fiction as well. Thanks for the post, Vonda. Part of good storytelling is how to include facts.
ReplyDeleteKaty, I'm actually glad you explained that one because I've never seen it used that way! I love studying good writing, too. We can learn a lot if we pay attention!
DeleteHappy birthday Vonda! I think that comment of "getting old ain't for wimps" may be just an excuse. :)
ReplyDelete