Monday, April 9, 2018

Twitter Changes March 2018—It’s a Whole New World for Writers


by Edie Melson @EdieMelson

I know, the thought of yet another huge shift in an online network makes me tired too. But all these recent changes are in response to dissatisfaction of the network users. And I truly believe that once the dust settles, we’ll all be much happier with the way things work.

We’ve talked at length about the recent changes on Facebook.

Now, as of March 23, Twitter has virtually reinvented itself. 

It really had no choice. Things had gotten out of hand in ways most people weren’t even aware of. For example, they have estimated that approximately 15% of the active twitter accounts weren’t even real people. They were bots, designed to artificially increase visibility, affect trends, and hijack the newsfeed. 

That is the foundational reason that Twitter has now instigated some stringent new rules. Rules that pertain to everyone, even if we weren’t part of the initial problem. So let’s get down to the list of what has changed on Twitter.

Twitter Changes
1. Automation Changes. 
The biggest change has come along the path of automated programs, such as Hootsuite, Buffer, and yes, Thunderclap. Twitter is no longer allowing the programs to post the exact same tweets to multiple accounts. 

Let me give you an example. I have two Twitter accounts that I manage that are very similar in audience type: Edie Melson and BRMCWC. Both accounts are places that I share valuable writing and publishing information. 

Because of this change, I cannot compose a single tweet about a link I find valuable and schedule it to send to both accounts. Even if I send it at different times or on different days, it’s not allowed. 

What I can do:
I have two options open for this change. 
  • I can retweet the information shared on Edie Melson from the BRMCWC account. 
  • I can compose a different tweet about the same link. 

2. Simultaneous actions.
We also are no longer allowed to simultaneously perform the same action (likes, retweet or follows) from multiple accounts. This isn’t something I’ve ever done, but I want to be thorough. 

We can leave our scheduling program, sign in and out of accounts, and do this. But that’s extremely labor intensive and I’m uncertain that it would ever be really worth the effort.

3. Sending the same tweet over and over again. 
A lot of accounts do this. They find a tweet that performs well and send it out several times over the course of a month or so. I have never recommended doing this, simply because if the same person sees it multiple times, they can be irritated or just begin to ignore that account because of the lack of fresh content. 

That said, I don’t consider this behavior—within moderation—to be a spammy use of Twitter. It builds on the fact that less than 16% of our audience is online at any given time. But Twitter didn’t ask me, so we’re stuck with abiding by their rules. 

What I can do:
I can rephrase the tweet I want to send and use the variations to abide by the rules while still reaching a larger portion of my online audience.

Twitter has been vague about when and if a tweet can ever be repeated. It may come out that it can’t be repeated within a certain time frame, but Twitter has been quiet on that point. We’ll just have to take a wait and see attitude.

4. Change in the Twitter Newsfeed
This change actually occurred some time ago (the end of last year). But it’s so subtle that a lot of people haven’t noticed. 

Twitter now organizes your newsfeed in a very specific manner. 
First, there are several popular tweets from accounts you follow.
Next, there’s a section of “in case you missed it” tweets that have been recently popular from the accounts you follow.
Finally, there is the orderly list of current tweets—in the order they were sent out. 

Once you realize how your newsfeed is organized, you can move through the sections that don’t interest you and on to the things you wish to see. 

At the foundation of these changes is the outcry from users to get rid of advertising and return us to person-to-person connections. That is only a positive move for us as writers. The more real our connection with our audience, the more loyal they’ll be and the more we can cement our relationship. 

Now it’s your turn. What is your opinion about all these changes? What questions do you have? Leave your comments in the section below and let’s learn together!

Don’t forget to join the conversation!
Blessings,
Edie

TWEETABLES

Twitter has also made some major changes as of March 23, how writers can continue to connect with readers - @EdieMelson (Click to Tweet)

23 comments:

  1. Edie, thank you for always sharing useful, timely, and pertinent information. So much to keep track of and you make it easier to stay on top of things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary, thank you! There is a lot to keep track of for writers and I try to help in the social media corner :) Blessings, E

      Delete
  2. I'm sure glad you can keep all these changes in perspective Ms. Edie. Without your blog, I think I would have thrown up my hands in surrender. Thanks as always ma'am. God's blessings...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jim, it's still a temptation. But God has a plan!

      Delete
  3. Does this mean that authors won't be able to set up Thunderclap campaigns for book launches? How will that work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cathy, Right now the Thunderclap website is still there. They aren't scheduling any campaigns and have an automated message when someone tries to set one up. I have no idea where they'll go from here, but this update kills there business model.

      Delete
  4. At this point and time I'm not on Twitter, but I never thought I'd be on Facebook, and I definitely never thought I'd be on Pinterest, soooo. I'm always glad to be kept 'up to speed' even on things I'm not dealing with and I definitely won't ever be on--wink, wink. Thanks, Edie. ;) Donevy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Donevy, it's sometimes a race to keep up, but it's good to stay informed! Thanks for stopping by, Blessings E

      Delete
  5. Thanks, Edie. Sounds like these are positive changes Twitter users can embrace. Shared.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Linda, I believe they are. It's just going to take a little getting used to! LOL! Blessings, E

      Delete
  6. Thanks for the clarity, Edie. Now, if they can keep the princes, endless celebrities, soldiers, and loving, single fathers from following me, I'll be happy. It's gotten so I dread having to wade through my follower list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sandra, it doesn't matter who follows you. Don't follow them back and ignore them unless they send private messages. Don't waste time and energy trying to control who is following you. Blessings, E

      Delete
    2. Edie, I actually think it's not a waste of time trying to control who follows me. I prefer to keep my list of followers in my niche and as collection of true followers, which I think editors can appreciate. I have a fast maintenance system, though, and when I keep on top of it, it only takes me about a minute or two a day because I can spot & delete spam followers so quickly. That keeps them from attracting more of the same. If you look at my list of followers and spot a spammer, it's one I'll catch in a day or two. Each day I open up my followers list, then block (& often report) all obvious ones. Ones I am unsure about I R click, to open in a new tab, then read their last 4 tweets. Porn accounts and fake military officer dating profiles are easy to spot. By keeping these trimmed out I usually only have to delete 2-5 a day. I find it very worthwhile keeping a real follower list, and like knowing my current 8809 followers are real people. I've made fabulous writing-related connections on Twitter and love it.

      Delete
  7. I am always impressed by the practical application of your tips. There are always so many useful nuggets of info. Thanks for another great post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kass, thank you so much! I do try to pull out what we can use and leave the drama to others! Blessings, E

      Delete
  8. Thanks for the info and tips, Edie. I wish they would get rid of auto direct messages.
    The bots were annoying.
    Hopefully people would try to engage one on one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ingmar, I agree! Unfortunately I think we're going to see more of that before they begin cracking down. :( Blessings, E

      Delete
  9. Replies
    1. Sherri, glad it was helpful! thanks for stopping by, Blessings, E

      Delete
  10. Thanks for explaining this so clearly. I think it will help that the same tweet can't be repeated so much. I tend to tune out or ignore the repeats and sometimes even unfollow if it's done too much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barbara, I agree. I don't care for accounts that repeat the same exact tweets. Blessings, E

      Delete
  11. Thanks for easy-to-understand info, Edie. I am so new to Twitter, I haven't formed any real routines yet, but I love having a starting place. You are a wonderful teacher! Hugs.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Edie, thanks so much for helping keep writers informed about changes like this! Also, your blog in general is terrific. I love sharing your articles with other authors.

    ReplyDelete