by Henry McLaughlin @RiverBendSagas
One comment I hear
frequently from readers is how much they like my characters, especially my
secondary characters. I’m often asked how I find them and develop them or what
techniques do I use to create them.
In my first Riverbend novel,
Journey to Riverbend, readers expressed a genuine liking for the Indian
tracker, Old Thomas. Some even asked how I could kill him. My tongue-in-cheek
response was I didn’t kill him, I was just writing along and found him dead. Which
isn’t true. From my earliest outlines, I knew Old Tomas would die in the story.
He needed to in order to spur my hero, Michael Archer forward on his quest to
keep his promise. I was surprised to find so many readers liked him.
Another character who draws
a lot of interest is Martha Matthews, the pastor’s wife. Martha is the exact
opposite of the stereotypical Old West pastor’s wife. She’s sarcastic, has no
tolerance for fools, and seems to have never had an unspoken thought. Which can
get her in all kinds of trouble. But this was a side of Martha I didn’t
envision. This came out after she walked on the page.
Her real purpose was to be a
support and mentor to my heroine, Rachel Stone. A role she filled quite well.
Her snarkiness was a serendipitous bonus that added both humor and conflict to
the story.
When I began writing, I
wrote very detailed sketches for my main characters. In depth questionnaires,
Myer-Briggs profiles, and other tools formed my hero and heroine. I wanted to
know everything about them before I wrote them.
Not so much with my
secondary characters. They appeared in the story loosely framed. I had a
general idea of who they were. Over the course of the novel, as they walked out
their roles, their personalities blossomed.
As I’ve moved into more of a
seat-of-the-pants writer, I’ve changed the way I develop characters, even my
main characters. Instead of pages of questionnaires and personality profiles, I
have perhaps two to three paragraphs about hero and heroine. One is basic
demographics. The second identifies one or two significant events in their
past. The third is their story goals and their major opposition.
Then I let them loose in the
story. They reveal the depths of their personalities through their actions and
reactions to what happens in the story. When I use this method, they are more
fresh and alive. They are more complex and believable and the story world is
more vibrant because I’m experiencing it through them.
I find this very freeing for
myself, for the characters and for the plot. I’m not constricted into making
them fit the character profile I wrote, I’m not forcing them to stay within the
profile, and I’m more likely to discover what they would most naturally do in a
situation. And the story becomes more alive because of it.
How about you? What
techniques and tools work best for you in developing characters?
TWEETABLES
He serves as Associate Director of North Texas Christian Writers.
Henry edits novels, leads critique groups, and teaches at conferences and workshops. He enjoys mentoring and coaching individual writers.
Connect with Henry on his blog, Twitter and Facebook.
highly impressive.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Aadil.
DeleteWhen I write a scene, I know what I want it to accomplish, but I don't know how I'll get there until I turn my characters loose. Thanks for the post. It's nice to know other writers have characters that take on a life of their own.
ReplyDeleteI've even had my characters go on strike because they thought they were telling the story better than I had outlined it (back when I was outlining). And they were right.
DeleteThanks, Henry. Pinned & shared.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Linda.
DeleteIt's much more enjoyable when characters feel free to show you who they are!
ReplyDeleteAmen, Debra. It's their story and they know more about it than I do. I think it was William Faulkner who said he just followed his characters around and wrote down everything they said and everything they did.
Delete