by Henry McLaughlin @RiverBendSagas
TWEETABLE
Leading a #writing critique group is one of the hardest yet most rewarding places to be - @RiverBendSagas (Click to Tweet)
Henry’s debut novel, Journey to Riverbend, won the 2009 Operation First Novel contest.
He serves as Associate Director of North Texas Christian Writers.
Henry edits novels, leads critique groups, and teaches at conferences and workshops. He enjoys mentoring and coaching individual writers.
Connect with Henry on his blog, Twitter and Facebook.
Leadership
is tough work. It may look easy to the outsider but to the person in charge,
challenges compete with, and sometimes threaten, success.
Leading
a writers critique group is one of the hardest yet most rewarding places to be.
Hardest
because at times it feels like you’re herding wet cats.
Hardest
because the leader has to deal with a variety of egos: the shy, the easily
offended, the super confident, the strong ego, the dominator, the stubborn, the
eager to learn, and the “God gave me every word of this manuscript” person.
Hardest
because, at times, the leader will sacrifice themselves for the sake of the
group. She’ll not share something for critique to give others more time. There
may be times when he’ll have to take a tougher stance than he wants to guide a
discussion.
One of
the most difficult things a leader will ever face is asking a member to leave
the group because they are disruptive, too dominating, too unwilling to learn,
too argumentative. The group has to be more important than any one member but
it’s still very tough to actually have to take the necessary actions.
Leading
a group is also the most rewarding thing a writer can do. It’s rewarding when
we see the light bulb go off and someone gets new insight into the craft or her
story. Rewarding when the shy one opens
up and gives a gentle yet effective critique. Rewarding when we see a writer
improve from meeting to meeting. Rewarding when a member is accepted for
publication.
The
leader is expected to model behavior for the group such as how to use the
sandwich method when giving a critique, respecting the time limits of the
meeting, and setting the tone of the meeting. Her skills will be drawn upon
when helping to get everyone involved in the discussions and keeping one person
from dominating.
The
leader must be a person the others respect. And this doesn’t mean the leader is
the best writer or the best teacher.
He is
above all an encourager. Not only encouraging people within the meeting, but
also encouraging the members to submit to agents and editors, to enter
contests; to risk by putting their work out there to be judged by others; to
risk rejection.
The
leader encourages by helping the group celebrate each success and each
rejection. She helps the group focus on the notion that rejection does not mean
failure. Rejection is an opportunity to learn.
Thomas
Edison is reported to have made over a thousand attempts at inventing the light
bulb and never saw an unsuccessful attempt as a failure. He described each attempt
as learning one more way how not to make a light bulb. He learned and applied
and eventually succeeded.
To see
a writer blossom and know you had a part in it makes the whole effort worth it.
What
do you look for in a leader?
TWEETABLE
Leading a #writing critique group is one of the hardest yet most rewarding places to be - @RiverBendSagas (Click to Tweet)
Henry’s debut novel, Journey to Riverbend, won the 2009 Operation First Novel contest.
He serves as Associate Director of North Texas Christian Writers.
Henry edits novels, leads critique groups, and teaches at conferences and workshops. He enjoys mentoring and coaching individual writers.
Connect with Henry on his blog, Twitter and Facebook.
Service is the essence of leadership. I look for a leader who listens and puts the group ahead of his/hers interests.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, great blog post.
Thank you for sharing, I will share this with all the table leaders at Word Weavers Woodstock.
ReplyDelete